Global Economic Sanction | COVID-19 | Editorial Hunt | 28th March 2020

Spread the love

IASbhai Editorial Hunt

No one can make you feel inferior without your consent.– Eleanor Roosevelt

Dear Aspirants
IASbhai Editorial Hunt is an initiative to dilute major Editorials of leading Newspapers in India which are most relevant to UPSC preparation –‘THE HINDU, LIVEMINT , INDIAN EXPRESS’ and help millions of readers who find difficulty in answer writing and making notes everyday. Here we choose two editorials on daily basis and analyse them with respect to UPSC MAINS 2020.

EDITORIAL 39:“It’s also a fight against punitive measures

       SOURCES:   THE HINDU EDITORIAL/EDITORIALS FOR UPSC CSE MAINS 2020

T.P. Sreenivasan

T.P. Sreenivasan, a former diplomat, is Chairman, Academic Council and Director, NSS Academy of Civil Services, and also Director General, Kerala International Centre, Thiruvananthapuram

      HEADLINES:

It’s also a fight against punitive measures

      CENTRAL THEME:

The requirement of massive resources following the pandemic may be an occasion to lift global economic sanctions

SYLLABUS COVERED: GS 3: CAATSA: ECONOMIC ADVERSARIES

      MAINS QUESTION:

Sanction during the times of humanitarian disaster do not help either developed countries nor the developing countries. Critically Analyse -(GS 3)

      LEARNING: 

This article will teach you the consequences of imposing Sanctions by countries and organizations haphazardly without bilateral consensus.

      INTRODUCTION: 

A global pandemic demands game-changing actions by all nations in order to halt its global spread, provide relief in terms of medical supplies and to rebuild shattered lives.

The global community has the responsibility to rise to the occasion.

Any global cataclysm affects poor countries more than the rich ones as the former do not have the resources to meet the unexpected economic challenge.

While the developed countries and their groups provide economic packages to themselves and their partners, developing countries stare into the distance with hope of handouts from the international financial institutions or some generous rich allies.

One way of dealing with the emergency in an emergency mode is to consider lifting of economic sanctions imposed by the United Nations and individual countries on developing countries.

      BODY: 

SANCTIONS AND THE SANCTITY:

Many international sanctions imposed on the basis of political and economic decisions and taken as a part of diplomatic efforts by countries, multilateral or regional organisations against states or organisations exist around the world.

  • These were meant either to ‘protect national security interests, or to protect international law, and defend against threats to international peace and security.
  • These measures include the temporary imposition on a target of economic, trade, diplomatic, cultural or other restrictions’ and can be lifted only through a long process of ascertaining whether their objectives were met.
  • The UN Security Council has a ‘mandate by the international community to apply sanctions that are binding on all UN member states.
  • Peace enforcement is possible if the sanctions fail, but that is only in the rarest of rare cases.

CONDITIONS PREVAILING

  • The sanctions often lie dormant for technical reasons even if their original intent and purpose have lost their relevance.
  • The victims of these sanctions suffer in silence or engage in negotiations to get relief.

WHEN AMERICA STRUCK

TYPES OF SANCTIONS:

Apart from UN sanctions, there are ‘unilateral sanctions that are imposed by individual countriesin furtherance of their strategic objectives.

Typically intended as strong economic coercion, measures applied under unilateral sanctions can range between coercive diplomatic efforts, economic warfare, or a threat of war’.

These take the form of economic, diplomatic, military and sport sanctions.

EXAMPLE ON THE GLOBE:

  • After the initial invasion of Kuwait by Iraq, the UN ‘placed an embargo on the nation in an attempt to prevent an armed conflict.
  • The U.S.’s withdrawal from the Iran deal has now resulted in Iran facing crippling sanctions.
  • Perhaps, the impact of COVID-19 was severe in Iran on account of the sanctions and the resultant economic crisis in the country.
  • Temporary sanctions in protest against the policies of countries often result in expulsion or withdrawal of diplomatic personnel.
  • The politics of sanctions entered a new era when “Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act” (CAATSA)that grouped together sanctions against Russia, Iran and North Korea.
The wide network of sanctions is comprehensively monitored by the Office of Foreign Assets Control of the US Department of the Treasury which enforces economic and trade sanctions based on U.S. foreign policy and national security goals against targeted foreign countries and regimes and related entities and individuals.

NO CALCULATION

  • There is no estimate of the losses sustained by these countries on account of these sanctions.
  • But these countries will be much relieved if these restrictions are removed.

      IASbhai Windup: 

The present global pandemic and the requirement of massive resources may be an occasion to lift these sanctions.

The countries which have imposed these sanctions will not have to make any financial outlay to assist these countries at this time of a humanitarian emergency.

The G20 Chairman, the King of Saudi Arabia, on a suggestion by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, had convened a video conference of G20 leaders.

As a follow up of that meeting, the G20 could consider proposing the lifting of multilateral and bilateral sanctions.

As Winston Churchill said, “ Never let a good crisis go to waste.”


Spread the love

You have successfully subscribed to the newsletter

There was an error while trying to send your request. Please try again.

IASbhai will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide updates and marketing.