Manufacturing Policy into Action and Analysis | UPSC

Spread the love

IASbhai Daily Editorial Hunt | 15th Oct 2020

A real decision is measured by the fact that you’ve taken a new action. If there’s no action, you haven’t truly decided.– Tony Robbins

Dear Aspirants
IASbhai Editorial Hunt is an initiative to dilute major Editorials of leading Newspapers in India which are most relevant to UPSC preparation –‘THE HINDU, LIVEMINT , INDIAN EXPRESS’ and help millions of readers who find difficulty in answer writing and making notes everyday. Here we choose two editorials on daily basis and analyse them with respect to UPSC MAINS 2020-21.

EDITORIAL HUNT #189 :“Manufacturing Policy into Action and Analysis | UPSC

Manufacturing Policy into Action and Analysis | UPSC

Chidambaran G. Iyer
Manufacturing Policy into Action and Analysis | UPSC

Chidambaran G. Iyer is Associate Professor, Centre for Development Studies, Thiruvananthapuram.

      HEADLINES:

Phased manufacturing policy that is hardly smart

      CENTRAL THEME:

Largely applicable to the mobile phone manufacturing sector, the plan has fared poorly in domestic value addition

SYLLABUS COVERED: GS 3 : Economy : Manufacturing Sector : Scheme

      MAINS QUESTION:

PLI Scheme aims at transforming India into a major manufacturing hub . Critically analyse the drawbacks and scope of optimisation. -(GS 3)

      LEARNING: 

  • PLI SCHEME
  • Focus on Value Production
  • Shift from China

      INTRODUCTION: 

The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY)has approved mobile manufacturing sector for the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme on April 1, 2020.

PRODUCTION LINKED INCENTIVE SCHEME 

  • AIM : PLI Scheme is to transform India into a major mobile manufacturing hub.
  • KEY PLAYERS : These are five domestic and five foreign mobile phone producers and six component manufacturers.
  • BACKGROUND : The PLI comes on the back of a phased manufacturing programme (PMP) that began in 2016-17 and was supposed to culminate in 2019-20.

The PMP incentivised the manufacture of low value accessories initially, and then moved on to the manufacture of higher value components.

  • PROTECTIONISM : This was done by increasing the basic customs duty on the imports of these accessories or components.
  • AUGMENTATION AND SURPLUS : The PMP was implemented with an aim to improve value addition in the country.

      BODY: 

MORE IMPORTS IN INDIA

  • FOREIGN INVESTMENT : Firms such as Apple, Xiaomi, Oppo, and OnePlus have invested in India, but mostly through their contract manufacturers.

As a result, production increased from $13.4 billion in 2016-17 to $31.7 billion in 2019-20.

  • ANNUAL SURVEY OF INDUSTRIES DATA : Analysis of production data shows that in 2017-18, value addition for surveyed firms ranged from 1.6% to 17.4%, with most of the firms being below 10%.
  • IMPORTED INPUTS : For the majority of the surveyed firms, more than 85% of the inputs were imported.
  • GLOBAL COMPARISON : Comparable UN data for India, China, Vietnam, Korea and Singapore (2017-2019), show that except for India, all countries exported more mobile phone parts than imports .
  • EASE OF DOING BUSINESS :  Which indicates the presence of facilities that add value to these parts before exporting them.
  • IMPORTS VS EXPORTS : India, on the other hand, imported more than it exported, the least being in 2019 when its imports of mobile phone parts were 25 times the exports.
  • WORK IN PROGRESS : Therefore, while the PMP policy increased the value of domestic production, improvement in local value addition remains a work-in-progress.
  • TARIFF BATTLE :  Further, in September 2019, Chinese Taipei contested the raise in tariffs under the PMP.
  • WTO COMPLIANCE : If the PMP is found to be World Trade Organization (WTO) non-compliant, then we may be flooded with imports of mobile phones .

This might make the local assembly of mobile phones unattractive.

  • STRUCTURE : This will affect the operations of the mobile investments done under the PMP.

FOCUS ON VALUE OF PRODUCTION

  • INCENTIVES : The new PLI policy offers an incentive subject to thresholds of incremental investment and sales of manufactured goods.
  • DIFFERENT LAYERS : These thresholds vary for foreign and domestic mobile firms.
  • FOCUS : Thus, focus remains on increasing value of domestic production, and not local value addition.
  • ESTIMATIONS :  If implemented in full swing, an additional capacity of 60 crore mobile phones per year may be onstream at the end of the PLI, i.e. FY25.

SHIFT FROM CHINA IS UNLIKELY

  • CHINESE DOMINANCE : Chinese firms that dominate the Indian market are not a part of the PLI policy.
  • EXPANSION : Thus their capacity expansion, if any, will be in addition to this.
  • NET PRODUCTION : India produced around 29 crore units of mobile phones for the year 2018-19; 94% of these were sold in the domestic market, with the remaining being exported.
  • SURPLUS PRODUCTION IS NEEDED : This implies that much of the incremental production and sales under the PLI policy will have to be for the export market.

MARKET STUDY

  • EFFECTIVE COST : If the cost of production of a mobile phone is say 100, then the effective cost (with subsidies and other benefits) of manufacturing mobile phone in China is 79.55, Vietnam, 89.05, and India (including PLI), 92.51.-Ernst & Young Study on India Cellular.

This shows that incentives under the PLI policy may not turn out to be a game-changing move.

  • MANUFACTURING BASE : It may be premature to expect a major chunk of mobile manufacturing to shift from China to India.
  • REGRESSIVE PRICING : Numbers show that though India’s mobile phone exports grew from $1.6 billion in 2018-19 to $3.8 billion in 2019-20, the per unit value declined from $91.1 to $87, respectively.
  • EXPORT COMPETITIVENESS : Thus, our export competitiveness seems to be in mobiles with lower selling price.
  • INCENTIVE COMPUTATIONS : However, for foreign firms chosen under the PLI policy, the incentive will be computed on the basis of the invoice value of phones available at and above ₹15,000 ($204.65).
  • SELLING AT LOWER PRICE : PLI policy does not strengthen our current export competitiveness in mobile phones and markets with higher average selling price have lower volumes.

DIFFICULT FOR DOMESTIC FIRMS

  • FOREIGN FIRMS : The five foreign firms that have been chosen are Samsung and four of Apple’s contract manufacturers.
  • DEPENDANCY : Samsung and two of Apple’s contract manufacturers already have facilities in India, and can be expected to continue with their strategy of dependence on imported inputs.
  • LOCAL PLAYERS : Domestic firms have been nearly wiped out from the Indian market.
  • GRABBING DOMESTIC MARKET : So, their ability to take advantage of the PLI policy and grab a sizeable domestic market share seems difficult.
  • ALTERNATIVES : Domestic firms may have the route of exporting cheaper mobile phones to other low-income countries.

However, their performance in the last couple of years has not been promising.

EXAMPLE
Among the chosen domestic firms, Lava International reported exports of just ₹324 crore in FY18, while Optiemus Electronics exported ₹83 crore in FY18 and ₹4 lakh in FY19.

      IASbhai Windup: 

SUPPLY CHAIN COLOCATION

  • WELCOME STEP : The six component firms, given approval under the ‘specified electronic components segment’, do not complete the mobile manufacturing ecosystem.

It was a surprise when it was found through our primary survey that though Samsung is invested hugely in India, it has not colocated its supply chain in the country.

  • VALUE ADDITION : In summary, the PMP policy, since 2016-17 has barely been helpful in raising domestic value addition in the industry even though value of production expanded considerably.
  • ON WTO TABLES : As backward integration via tariff protection is likely to come up against WTO rules, the new PLI focus is on increasing domestic production, and not value addition.
  • SEPARATE LICENSE : The policy has separately licensed six component manufacturers to start domestic manufacturing.
  • NURTURING SUPPLY ECOSYSTEM : A first step in this direction could be to encourage foreign firms chosen under the PLI policy to colocate their supply ecosystems in the country.

This PLI Scheme may not achieve its final targets as the assemblers and component manufacturers do not move together in this scheme.

SUGGESTED READING : PLI SCHEME
       SOURCES:   THE HINDU EDITORIAL HUNT | Manufacturing Policy into Action and Analysis | UPSC

 

TRENDING NOW : Important The Hindu Editorials 

If you liked this article, then please subscribe to our YouTube Channel for Daily Current Affairs , Editorial Analysis & Answer writing video tutorials. You can also find us on Twitter and Facebook.


Spread the love

Leave a Comment

You have successfully subscribed to the newsletter

There was an error while trying to send your request. Please try again.

IASbhai will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide updates and marketing.